Two readings, side by side
Ostium vs Pacifica
Not a scoring table. Two dated readings of the venues' own restriction pages, the countries where their lists differ, and each programme's declared terms — quoted, never improved.
The readings behind this page
- Ostium — read on 2026-08-31 docs.ostium.com #585a5727 Full Ostium list
- Pacifica — read on 2026-08-31 app.pacifica.fi #006524da Full Pacifica list
Named by Ostium, not by Pacifica
- AT Austria
- BE Belgium
- BG Bulgaria
- CY Cyprus
- CZ Czechia
- DE Germany
- DK Denmark
- EE Estonia
- ES Spain
- FI Finland
- FR France
- GR Greece
- HR Croatia
- HU Hungary
- IE Ireland
- IT Italy
- LT Lithuania
- LU Luxembourg
- LV Latvia
- MT Malta
- NL Netherlands
- PL Poland
- PT Portugal
- RO Romania
- SE Sweden
- SI Slovenia
- SK Slovakia
Named by Pacifica, not by Ostium
- CA Canada
- CN China
- RU Russia
- UA Ukraine
- VE Venezuela
Named by both
- CU Cuba
- GB United Kingdom (UK)
- IR Iran
- KP North Korea
- PH Philippines
- SY Syria
- US United States
If the edge can place your connection, your country's code is marked in the lists above.
What each programme declares
Ostium
Referral commission. The restricted-country list is still Ostium's; payment does not rewrite it.
Pacifica
Referral commission. The restricted-country list is still Pacifica's; payment does not rewrite it.
Questions
Which can I use from my country — Ostium or Pacifica?
The venues decide that, at KYC. What we publish is a different thing: whose list names which countries — yours marked when the connection can be placed — and the click is checked at the edge either way.
Do Ostium and Pacifica pay the same referral reward?
Each declares its own programme; both are quoted above verbatim and checked monthly. We add nothing to either.
Why do the two lists differ?
Different legal exposure, different regulators, different lawyers. We do not guess at reasons — we date what each page says and record every later change in the ledger.